H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Alicia Molik H2H: 4-1

Venus Williams holds a 4–1 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2007 Japan Open quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-3.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 2007* Japan Open WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #8 7-6(4) 6-3 Alicia Molik #74 Match data
Jan 25, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Alicia Molik #12 7-5 7-6(3) Venus Williams #9 Match data
Feb 27, 2004* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #18 6-3 6-4 Alicia Molik #34 Match data
Aug 29, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #2 6-1 6-2 Alicia Molik #80 Match data
May 30, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Venus Williams #5 6-3 6-1 Alicia Molik #97 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,035 151 161 48.4% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Alicia Molik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2000 6–10 37.5% #115 1,552 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2004 37–18 67.3% #13 1,938 0 4
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,779 0 5
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,632 0 5
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,628 0 5
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2008 1–5 16.7% #308 1,577 0 5
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,561 0 5
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,584 0 5
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47