H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 8-1

Venus Williams holds a 8–1 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 7–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2002 Miami fourth round 6-2 6-0.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
8 1
9 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 22, 2002* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Venus Williams #2 6-2 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #18 Match data
Jan 26, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Venus Williams #3 2-6 6-1 8-6 Amanda Coetzer #12 Match data
Aug 26, 2000* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-3 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #14 Match data
Aug 4, 2000* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-0 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #13 Match data
May 5, 2000* Hamburg WTA 500 QF Clay Amanda Coetzer #18 6-3 6-4 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Jul 31, 1999* Stanford WTA 250 SF Hard Venus Williams #4 6-1 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #9 Match data
May 1, 1999* Hamburg WTA 250 QF Clay Venus Williams #7 6-4 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #16 Match data
Feb 28, 1999* Oklahoma WTA 250 F Hard Venus Williams #5 6-4 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #10 Match data
Jan 15, 1999* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #5 7-6 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47