H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Amy Frazier H2H: 5-0

Venus Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2004 Stanford semifinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 17, 2004* Stanford WTA 500 SF Hard Venus Williams #15 6-3 6-1 Amy Frazier #25 Match data
Apr 11, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Venus Williams #2 6-1 7-5 Amy Frazier #53 Match data
Aug 5, 2000* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 6-3 Amy Frazier #26 Match data
Jul 29, 2000* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(5) Amy Frazier #21 Match data
Nov 3, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Venus Williams #321 4-6 6-3 6-3 Amy Frazier #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —