H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Anne Kremer H2H: 3-0

Venus Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2002 San Diego fourth round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2002* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #2 6-3 6-2 Anne Kremer #18 Match data
Apr 13, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 SF Clay Venus Williams #2 7-5 6-0 Anne Kremer #29 Match data
Sep 3, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #5 6-1 6-3 Anne Kremer #137 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —