H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Venus Williams vs Barbara Schett H2H: 3-1

Venus Williams holds a 3–1 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2001 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Barbara Schett #25 6-4 6-4 Venus Williams #2 Match data
Nov 15, 1999 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Venus Williams #3 6-4 7-6 Barbara Schett #8 Match data
Sep 9, 1999* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-4 6-3 Barbara Schett #12 Match data
Jun 26, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #6 6-1 6-2 Barbara Schett #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Barbara Schett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47