H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Venus Williams vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-1

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 1–0 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1996 Oakland third round 1-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 7, 1996* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #12 1-6 6-4 6-4 Venus Williams #207 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 — — — — — — —
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —