H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Venus Williams vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 3-0

Venus Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2015 Doha third round 3-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 26, 2015* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Venus Williams #17 3-6 6-2 6-1 Casey Dellacqua #34 Match data
Mar 20, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #31 6-4 5-7 6-4 Casey Dellacqua #56 Match data
Jan 23, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Venus Williams #6 6-1 7-6(4) Casey Dellacqua #980 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Casey Dellacqua
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —