H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Venus Williams vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 3-0

Venus Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2005 Charleston third round 7-6(1) 6-2.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 0
3 main draw meetings
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2005* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Venus Williams #8 7-6(1) 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #54 Match data
May 3, 2003* Warsaw WTA 500 SF Clay Venus Williams #3 6-3 7-6(5) Denisa Chladkova #39 Match data
Jan 21, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-4 6-1 Denisa Chladkova #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Denisa Chladkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47