H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Venus Williams vs Dinara Safina H2H: 3-1

Venus Williams holds a 3–1 lead over Dinara Safina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Dinara Safina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2009 Wimbledon semifinal 6-1 6-0.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 4, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Venus Williams #3 6-1 6-0 Dinara Safina #1 Match data
May 9, 2009* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Dinara Safina #1 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 Venus Williams #5 Match data
Nov 3, 2008 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Venus Williams #8 7-5 6-3 Dinara Safina #2 Match data
Oct 4, 2008* Stuttgart WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #8 6-4 6-2 Dinara Safina #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Dinara Safina #452 #1 10,521 2,120 299 160 65.1% 0 5 0 2 4 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Dinara Safina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 2002 12–5 70.6% #68 1,667 0 1
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2003 18–15 54.5% #54 1,749 0 2
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2004 20–19 51.3% #44 1,713 0 2
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2005 37–19 66.1% #20 1,839 0 4
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2006 44–21 67.7% #11 1,871 0 4
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2007 38–22 63.3% #15 1,862 0 4
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2008 51–18 73.9% #3 2,020 0 8
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2009 55–16 77.5% #2 1,951 0 11
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2010 13–16 44.8% #63 1,795 0 11
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2011 11–9 55.0% #132 1,783 0 11
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47