H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Fabiola Zuluaga H2H: 5-0

Venus Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Fabiola Zuluaga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2005 Roland Garros second round 6-3 3-6 6-3.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Venus Williams #13 6-3 3-6 6-3 Fabiola Zuluaga #40 Match data
Mar 26, 2005* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #9 6-2 6-0 Fabiola Zuluaga #30 Match data
Jun 1, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Venus Williams #9 6-1 7-6(3) Fabiola Zuluaga #24 Match data
Apr 30, 2004* Warsaw WTA 500 R16 Clay Venus Williams #13 4-6 6-2 6-0 Fabiola Zuluaga #23 Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #6 6-3 6-4 Fabiola Zuluaga #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Fabiola Zuluaga #85 #16 1,362 1,856 113 97 53.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Fabiola Zuluaga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #386 1,484 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #290 1,480 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #138 1,465 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1997 0–1 0.0% #169 1,459 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1998 3–2 60.0% #87 1,504 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1999 19–11 63.3% #51 1,686 0 2
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2000 18–18 50.0% #39 1,688 0 2
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2002 13–12 52.0% #75 1,658 0 3
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2003 21–17 55.3% #38 1,736 0 4
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2004 27–19 58.7% #23 1,746 0 5
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2005 12–13 48.0% #85 1,683 0 5
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47