H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Venus Williams vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 4-4

Venus Williams and Flavia Pennetta are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2014 Dubai quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Flavia Pennetta
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 2014* Dubai WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #44 6-3 7-5 Flavia Pennetta #22 Match data
Aug 14, 2009* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Flavia Pennetta #12 7-6(2) 6-4 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Mar 1, 2009* Acapulco WTA 250 F Clay Venus Williams #5 6-1 6-2 Flavia Pennetta #15 Match data
Oct 19, 2008* Zurich WTA 500 F Hard Venus Williams #9 7-6(1) 6-2 Flavia Pennetta #17 Match data
Oct 9, 2008* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Hard Flavia Pennetta #18 6-4 2-6 6-4 Venus Williams #8 Match data
May 31, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Flavia Pennetta #30 7-5 6-3 Venus Williams #7 Match data
Oct 13, 2007* Bangkok WTA 500 SF Hard Flavia Pennetta #49 6-4 7-6(8) Venus Williams #8 Match data
Sep 29, 2007* Seoul WTA 250 SF Hard Venus Williams #9 6-2 6-2 Flavia Pennetta #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Flavia Pennetta #15 #6 3,621 1,982 418 272 60.6% 1 1 0 6 3 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Flavia Pennetta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 — — — — — — —
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2002 1–3 25.0% #95 1,482 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2003 18–20 47.4% #69 1,559 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2004 30–22 57.7% #38 1,670 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2005 37–21 63.8% #23 1,777 0 3
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2006 29–18 61.7% #28 1,729 0 3
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2007 30–24 55.6% #39 1,768 0 4
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2008 50–23 68.5% #13 1,900 0 6
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2009 52–23 69.3% #12 1,902 0 8
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2010 45–23 66.2% #24 1,847 0 9
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2011 31–22 58.5% #20 1,785 0 9
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2012 19–13 59.4% #45 1,735 0 9
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2013 19–20 48.7% #31 1,745 0 9
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2014 30–20 60.0% #12 1,780 0 10
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2015 27–20 57.4% #8 1,823 1 11
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —