H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Florencia Labat H2H: 1-0

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 1997 San Diego third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 1997* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Venus Williams #64 6-3 6-2 Florencia Labat #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,875 190 181 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1992 18–16 52.9% #52 1,736 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,764 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,793 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,783 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1996 24–17 58.5% #42 1,767 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2000 8–9 47.1% #106 1,624 0 0
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —