H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 1-0

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2010 Wimbledon fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Venus Williams #2 6-4 7-6(5) Jarmila Wolfe #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —