H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Venus Williams vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 4-1

Venus Williams holds a 4–1 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2002 San Diego final 6-2 6-2.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 2002* San Diego WTA 500 F Hard Venus Williams #2 6-2 6-2 Jelena Dokic #5 Match data
Feb 11, 2002* Paris WTA 500 F Carpet Venus Williams #2 (w/o) Jelena Dokic #6 Match data
May 5, 2001* Hamburg WTA 500 SF Clay Venus Williams #2 6-3 6-1 Jelena Dokic #28 Match data
Mar 26, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 6-3 Jelena Dokic #28 Match data
May 19, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Jelena Dokic #37 6-1 6-2 Venus Williams #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Jelena Dokic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47