H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Venus Williams vs Jill Craybas H2H: 2-0

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2007 Japan Open third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2007* Japan Open WTA 500 R32 Hard Venus Williams #8 6-3 6-1 Jill Craybas #97 Match data
Jun 28, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Venus Williams #16 6-0 6-2 Jill Craybas #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 — — — — — — —
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 — — — — — — —
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 — — — — — — —
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —