H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 1-1

Venus Williams and Julie Halard-Decugis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 1999 Zurich quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 16, 1999* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 6-3 Julie Halard-Decugis #8 Match data
Mar 10, 1996* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Julie Halard-Decugis #18 6-2 6-4 Venus Williams #217 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —