H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Venus Williams vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 4-0

Venus Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2014 US Open first round 2-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Venus Williams #20 2-6 6-3 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Mar 20, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #18 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Mar 20, 2012* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Venus Williams #134 6-0 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jun 24, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #30 6-7(6) 6-3 8-6 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 — — — — — — —
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 — — — — — — —
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 — — — — — — —
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 — — — — — — —
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8