H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 10:36 UTC

Venus Williams vs Kimiko Date H2H: 4-0

Venus Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2014 US Open round of 128 2-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Venus Williams #20 2-6 6-3 6-3 Kimiko Date #88 Match data Aug 27, 2014* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #18 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 Kimiko Date #78 Match data Mar 20, 2013* R64 Miami WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #134 6-0 6-3 Kimiko Date #78 Match data Mar 20, 2012* R128 Miami WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #30 6-7(6) 6-3 8-6 Kimiko Date #57 Match data Jun 24, 2011* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,370 781 297 72.4% 7 1 9 1 20 10 48
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,831 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,092 0 2 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,260 0 8 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,342 2 14 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,360 4 20 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,304 4 27 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,261 4 28 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,078 4 30 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 32 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 32 — — — — — — —
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 35 — — — — — — —
28 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 38 — — — — — — —
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 40 — — — — — — —
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 42 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 42 — — — — — — —
32 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 43 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 43 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,880 7 44 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,969 7 47 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,815 7 48 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,939 7 48 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,871 7 48 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,818 7 48 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,711 7 48 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,645 7 48 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,601 7 48 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 48 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Venus Williams Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 35 8 43 81.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 1999 34 5 39 87.2% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 486 187 673 72.2% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8% — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 580/731 of Venus Williams's and 149/164 of Kimiko Date's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Venus Williams Kimiko Date
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0% 2008 1/1 0.0 2.0 59.2% 51.7% 35.0% 44.4% 33.3% 44.9% 36.5%
38 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8% 2009 13/17 0.8 4.3 67.1% 59.1% 41.4% 54.1% 46.2% 53.0% 43.8%
39 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6% 2010 33/37 0.9 3.4 63.8% 59.3% 47.5% 49.2% 52.3% 54.8% 45.1%
40 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2% 2011 30/31 0.6 3.6 63.3% 56.5% 42.0% 46.1% 41.4% 51.2% 42.7%
41 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2% 2012 15/16 0.8 3.3 61.9% 58.2% 43.5% 48.8% 55.9% 52.0% 42.0%
42 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9% 2013 27/27 0.7 2.1 69.1% 57.3% 44.5% 47.7% 51.0% 53.3% 46.6%
43 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5% 2014 24/25 1.1 3.4 67.2% 57.3% 48.2% 43.4% 49.8% 54.3% 43.1%
44 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9% 2015 5/9 1.0 5.4 65.2% 53.7% 48.1% 42.2% 47.4% 51.7% 39.4%
45 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
46 2026 11/11 3.3 4.3 59.8% 63.1% 37.7% 45.6% 44.8% 53.3% 36.7% 2017 1/1 0.0 3.0 51.5% 23.5% 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 21.2% 19.4%
Career — 580/1,078 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0% — 149/435 0.8 3.3 65.2% 57.4% 44.8% 47.1% 48.6% 52.9% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Venus Williams Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
14 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +30 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -229 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 2092 173.9 — — — — +6 -323 -377 75.8% +2.05 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) -2.13 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 1999 2261 178.9 — — — — +6 -313 -473 78.4% +1.91 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) -5.78 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 2000 2343 171.5 — — — — +17 -403 -323 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) -2.96 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 2001 2361 172.4 — — — — +33 -382 -130 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) -1.50 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2002 2304 175.2 — — — — +59 -206 -11 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) -2.29 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +108 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) -1.73 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +60 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) +0.61 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) -3.16 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +281 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +32 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) -1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) -2.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) -2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) -1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 1880 149.6 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +51 +7 +267 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1970 157.3 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +40 -131 +137 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1816 132.9 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +11 +16 +296 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1940 149.4 +3.47 +3.28 1.155 53.0% -13 -81 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) -0.48 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 2018 1872 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +41 -80 +242 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) +0.45 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 2019 1818 145.3 +0.34 +1.09 0.992 50.0% +36 -40 +252 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) -1.81 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 2020 1712 125.8 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) -1.02 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 2021 1646 111.2 -2.68 -2.15 0.811 45.9% +77 -8 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 -0.73 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 2022 1601 107.5 -2.84 -1.19 0.703 43.0% +65 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 +0.11 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 2023 1592 114.4 -0.99 -0.36 0.880 47.2% +56 — +452 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) -0.08 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
Career — 2370 167.2 +3.56 +2.77 1.146 52.9% +33 -77 +111 69.0% +1.40 184–125 (60%) 137–100 (58%) -3.35 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.