H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Venus Williams vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 13-14

Lindsay Davenport holds a 14–13 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 27 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 11–9 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 4–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2005 Wimbledon final 4-6 7-6(4) 9-7.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
13 – 14
27 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 3, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Venus Williams #16 4-6 7-6(4) 9-7 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Apr 9, 2005* Amelia Island WTA 500 QF Clay Lindsay Davenport #1 1-6 6-3 6-4 Venus Williams #8 Match data
Sep 7, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 7-5 6-4 Venus Williams #12 Match data
Jul 24, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 7-5 2-0 (ret.) Venus Williams #13 Match data
Jul 18, 2004* Stanford WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(4) Venus Williams #15 Match data
Jul 4, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Venus Williams #4 6-2 2-6 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data
Aug 25, 2002* New Haven WTA 500 F Hard Venus Williams #2 7-5 6-0 Lindsay Davenport #10 Match data
Aug 3, 2002* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard Venus Williams #2 6-2 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #9 Match data
Aug 25, 2001* New Haven WTA 500 F Hard Venus Williams #4 7-6(6) 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #3 Match data
Aug 4, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #4 Match data
Jul 8, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Venus Williams #2 6-2 6-7(1) 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #3 Match data
Oct 20, 2000* Linz WTA 500 F Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 3-6 6-2 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam F Hard Venus Williams #3 6-4 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Jul 30, 2000* Stanford WTA 500 F Hard Venus Williams #3 6-1 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Jul 9, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Venus Williams #5 6-3 7-6 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Nov 13, 1999* Philadelphia WTA 250 SF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 6-2 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Aug 29, 1999* New Haven WTA 500 F Hard Venus Williams #4 6-2 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Aug 7, 1999* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard Venus Williams #4 6-4 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Aug 1, 1999* Stanford WTA 250 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 7-6 6-2 Venus Williams #4 Match data
Jan 29, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-4 6-0 Venus Williams #6 Match data
Oct 18, 1998* Zurich WTA 1000 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 7-5 6-3 Venus Williams #5 Match data
Sep 12, 1998* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-4 6-4 Venus Williams #5 Match data
Aug 2, 1998* Stanford WTA 250 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-4 5-7 6-4 Venus Williams #5 Match data
Feb 28, 1998* Oklahoma WTA 250 SF Hard Venus Williams #14 6-7 6-2 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Jan 30, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 1-6 7-5 6-3 Venus Williams #15 Match data
Oct 17, 1997* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-0 6-4 Venus Williams #26 Match data
Mar 12, 1997* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #8 6-4 5-7 7-6 Venus Williams #211 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —