H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 5-1

Venus Williams holds a 5–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2006 Wimbledon second round 6-7(4) 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Lisa Raymond
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #12 6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 Lisa Raymond #84 Match data
Nov 4, 2004* Philadelphia WTA 500 R32 Hard Venus Williams #10 6-2 6-1 Lisa Raymond #28 Match data
Jan 25, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lisa Raymond #30 6-4 7-6(5) Venus Williams #11 Match data
Jul 27, 2002* Stanford WTA 500 SF Hard Venus Williams #2 6-3 6-0 Lisa Raymond #28 Match data
Jul 3, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Venus Williams #1 6-1 6-2 Lisa Raymond #35 Match data
Sep 2, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Venus Williams #4 6-3 6-4 Lisa Raymond #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —