H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Venus Williams vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 3-3

Venus Williams and Magdalena Maleeva are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 3–0 on carpet, while Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2004 Warsaw quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 1, 2004* Warsaw WTA 500 QF Clay Venus Williams #13 6-1 6-0 Magdalena Maleeva #24 Match data
Oct 4, 2002* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #23 2-6 6-1 7-6(3) Venus Williams #2 Match data
Jan 23, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-0 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #16 Match data
Feb 17, 2001* Nice WTA 500 SF Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #20 7-6(8) 6-4 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Jan 16, 1998* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #21 6-2 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #34 Match data
Nov 4, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #7 6-2 6-3 Venus Williams #321 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Magdalena Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —