H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-0

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Joe Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 1999 US Open fourth round 2-6 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 7, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #3 2-6 6-1 6-0 Mary Joe Fernandez #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 — — — — — — —
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —