H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Mary Pierce H2H: 7-2

Venus Williams holds a 7–2 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2005 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-0 7-6(10).

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Venus Williams #16 6-0 7-6(10) Mary Pierce #14 Match data
May 30, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Venus Williams #9 6-3 6-1 Mary Pierce #31 Match data
Oct 16, 1999* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-4 6-4 Mary Pierce #6 Match data
May 9, 1999* Rome WTA 1000 F Clay Venus Williams #5 6-4 6-2 Mary Pierce #8 Match data
May 2, 1999* Hamburg WTA 250 F Clay Venus Williams #7 6-0 6-3 Mary Pierce #8 Match data
Oct 25, 1998* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 SF Carpet Mary Pierce #11 2-6 6-2 6-0 Venus Williams #5 Match data
Oct 17, 1998* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Hard Venus Williams #5 6-4 6-1 Mary Pierce #11 Match data
Sep 8, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #5 6-1 7-6 Mary Pierce #12 Match data
Aug 8, 1998* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Mary Pierce #16 2-6 7-6 4-0 (ret.) Venus Williams #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47