H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Venus Williams vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 5-2

Venus Williams holds a 5–2 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2003 Miami Open round of 16 7-6(2) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meghann Shaughnessy #22 7-6(2) 6-1 Venus Williams #2 Match data Mar 23, 2003* R16 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #2 6-2 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #31 Match data Aug 23, 2002* R16 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Venus Williams #2 6-4 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #19 Match data Jul 26, 2002* R16 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Meghann Shaughnessy #15 2-6 7-5 7-6(4) Venus Williams #2 Match data Jul 28, 2001* QF Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Venus Williams #2 6-3 6-0 Meghann Shaughnessy #25 Match data May 6, 2001* F Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Venus Williams #3 6-3 7-6(3) Meghann Shaughnessy #31 Match data Jan 19, 2001* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #3 7-6 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #51 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0
18 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2
24 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43 — — — — — — —
32 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Venus Williams Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8% — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 581/732 of Venus Williams's and 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Venus Williams Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1% 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4%
25 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1% 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3%
26 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5% 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2%
27 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6% 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9%
28 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0% 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4%
29 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1% 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7%
30 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4% 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6%
31 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
44 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
45 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
46 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0% — 94/466 5.2 4.2 53.4% 69.5% 45.8% 55.6% 39.9% 58.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Venus Williams Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.92 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72
18 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03
19 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) — -4.08 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65
20 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.30 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) — +2.27
21 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) — -1.53 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56
22 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) — -2.34 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) — +1.29
23 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.73 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.83
24 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.68 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.17
25 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — -2.36 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) — +1.24
26 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.33
27 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.59 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.20
28 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.46 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.26
29 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) — -2.55 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09
30 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.82 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71
31 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1941 149.8 +3.48 +3.27 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.1 -2.44 — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.