H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Meilen Tu H2H: 4-0

Venus Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2007 Amelia Island fourth round 6-2 7-5.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 6, 2007* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Venus Williams #32 6-2 7-5 Meilen Tu #51 Match data
Feb 9, 2002* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Venus Williams #2 6-1 6-3 Meilen Tu #58 Match data
Aug 30, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #4 6-2 6-2 Meilen Tu #46 Match data
Feb 17, 2001* Nice WTA 500 QF Carpet Venus Williams #3 6-4 7-6(2) Meilen Tu #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,519 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,485 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,474 0 1
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,625 0 1
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,546 0 1
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47