H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 2-0

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2001 Miami second round 6-2 6-0.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 0
2 main draw meetings
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 6-0 Miriam Oremans #81 Match data
Jun 23, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Venus Williams #5 6-1 7-5 Miriam Oremans #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47