H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-1

Venus Williams holds a 2–1 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2014 Quebec City final 6-4 6-3.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 14, 2014* Quebec City WTA 250 F Hard Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #80 6-4 6-3 Venus Williams #19 Match data
Feb 28, 2013* Florianopolis WTA 250 R32 Hard Venus Williams #20 6-3 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #107 Match data
Aug 28, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Venus Williams #2 6-0 6-0 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #214 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,692 0 1
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,776 0 2
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,757 0 2
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,601 0 2
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,596 0 2
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,546 0 2
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,526 0 2
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,538 0 2
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,519 0 2
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,563 0 2
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,657 0 3
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,629 0 3
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,698 0 3
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,689 0 3
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47