H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 2-1

Venus Williams holds a 2–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 1999 San Diego fourth round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 6, 1999* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #4 7-5 6-1 Natasha Zvereva #22 Match data
May 27, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Venus Williams #5 7-6(3) 6-0 Natasha Zvereva #15 Match data
Jun 19, 1998* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Natasha Zvereva #20 6-2 6-1 Venus Williams #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —