H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 1-1

Venus Williams and Nathalie Dechy are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass, while Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2000 Wimbledon third round 6-0 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 2, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Venus Williams #5 6-0 7-6(4) Nathalie Dechy #24 Match data
Aug 13, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nathalie Dechy #115 6-1 1-6 6-1 Venus Williams #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —