H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 4-2

Venus Williams holds a 4–2 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2001 San Diego quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #9 Match data
Jul 6, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Venus Williams #2 7-5 6-1 Nathalie Tauziat #10 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Venus Williams #3 6-4 1-6 6-1 Nathalie Tauziat #8 Match data
Oct 17, 1998* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Hard Venus Williams #5 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #8 Match data
Jun 21, 1997* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Nathalie Tauziat #22 6-3 5-7 6-4 Venus Williams #79 Match data
May 29, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Nathalie Tauziat #23 5-7 6-3 7-5 Venus Williams #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —