H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 2-0

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2005 Wimbledon second round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #16 7-5 6-3 Nicole Pratt #121 Match data
Jan 22, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #2 6-3 6-2 Nicole Pratt #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —