H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-0

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2001 Indian Wells fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 12, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-4 6-2 Rachel Mcquillan #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 195 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Rachel Mcquillan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,624 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,709 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1992 18–13 58.1% #38 1,752 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,573 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,650 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,668 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1996 2–9 18.2% #186 1,568 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,647 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,529 0 0
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,521 0 0
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,464 0 0
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,507 0 0
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,462 0 0
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,453 0 0
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —