H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 1-0

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 1995 Oakland third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Venus Williams #321 6-2 6-1 Rosalyn Fairbank #251 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —