H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 1-1

Venus Williams and Sabine Appelmans are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass, while Sabine Appelmans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2000 Wimbledon fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 4, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Venus Williams #5 6-4 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #27 Match data
Aug 16, 1995* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sabine Appelmans #33 6-4 7-6 Venus Williams Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —