H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 5-1

Venus Williams holds a 5–1 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2002 Dubai semifinal 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 23, 2002* Dubai WTA 500 SF Hard Sandrine Testud #11 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Venus Williams #2 Match data
Sep 4, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #4 6-4 6-0 Sandrine Testud #18 Match data
Aug 23, 2001* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #4 7-6(5) 6-3 Sandrine Testud #18 Match data
Nov 13, 1999* Philadelphia WTA 250 QF Carpet Venus Williams #3 6-1 7-6 Sandrine Testud #15 Match data
Aug 7, 1999* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Venus Williams #4 7-5 6-1 Sandrine Testud #14 Match data
Sep 4, 1997* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Venus Williams #66 7-5 7-5 Sandrine Testud #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,019 309 236 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,546 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,566 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,560 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,771 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,938 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,946 0 2
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,916 0 2
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,976 0 3
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,845 0 3
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2004 1–7 12.5% #313 1,739 0 3
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47