H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 1-0

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2001 Miami fourth round 7-5 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 25, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Venus Williams #3 7-5 7-6(2) Tathiana Garbin #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,710 167 207 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 — — — — — — —
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 — — — — — — —
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,468 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2000 23–19 54.8% #42 1,629 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,577 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,557 0 1
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2004 11–18 37.9% #58 1,535 0 1
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,557 0 1
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,628 0 1
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,647 0 1
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,597 0 1
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,575 0 1
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,569 0 1
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —