H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Venus Williams vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 2-0

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2000 Stanford fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2000* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 6-2 Tatiana Panova #49 Match data
Mar 21, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #11 6-3 6-3 Tatiana Panova #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —