H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Vania King H2H: 1-0

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2007 Japan Open fourth round 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 2007* Japan Open WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #8 6-0 6-4 Vania King #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,760 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,520 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,661 0 1
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,608 0 1
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,512 0 1
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,588 0 1
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,595 0 1
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,689 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,614 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,630 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,641 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,627 0 1
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,643 0 1
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,590 0 1
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,559 0 1
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —