H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Vera Dushevina H2H: 4-0

Venus Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Vera Dushevina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2009 Beijing second round 6-2 7-6(1).

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 7-6(1) Vera Dushevina #47 Match data
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 Vera Dushevina #47 Match data
Oct 15, 2004* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Venus Williams #12 6-0 6-4 Vera Dushevina #82 Match data
Jan 23, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #11 6-4 6-2 Vera Dushevina #112 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Vera Dushevina #741 #31 1,490 1,786 143 172 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Vera Dushevina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #473 1,485 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 2003 5–4 55.6% #113 1,552 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2004 12–16 42.9% #63 1,590 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2005 19–19 50.0% #40 1,657 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2006 12–22 35.3% #97 1,609 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2007 19–15 55.9% #40 1,747 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2008 12–17 41.4% #89 1,681 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2009 24–18 57.1% #43 1,762 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2010 19–19 50.0% #54 1,757 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2011 12–17 41.4% #86 1,724 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2012 5–15 25.0% #146 1,534 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2013 4–8 33.3% #124 1,554 0 1
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2014 0–1 0.0% #463 1,541 0 1
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47