H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-0

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2002 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #1 6-3 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #54 Match data
Jul 1, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Venus Williams #6 6-3 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —