H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vera Dushevina vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 1-0
Vera Dushevina holds a 1–0 lead over Aiko Nakamura in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Dushevina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Dushevina won the 2005 Seoul fourth round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 42
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Vera Dushevina | 6-3 7-6(5) | Aiko Nakamura | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Aiko Nakamura | #730 | #47 | 569 | 1,645 | 50 | 76 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Dushevina | Aiko Nakamura | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #71 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #57 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #66 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #146 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #677 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |