H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vera Dushevina vs Akiko Morigami H2H: 0-1
Akiko Morigami holds a 1–0 lead over Vera Dushevina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akiko Morigami leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Akiko Morigami won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 1-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Akiko Morigami | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Vera Dushevina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Dushevina | Akiko Morigami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |