H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vera Dushevina vs Camille Pin H2H: 1-0
Vera Dushevina holds a 1–0 lead over Camille Pin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Dushevina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vera Dushevina won the 2007 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Vera Dushevina | 6-4 6-4 | Camille Pin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Camille Pin | #1,143 | #61 | 752 | 1,619 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Dushevina | Camille Pin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |