H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vera Dushevina vs Cara Black H2H: 1-0
Vera Dushevina holds a 1–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Dushevina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vera Dushevina won the 2004 Rome second round 6-4 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2004* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Vera Dushevina | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Dushevina | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |