H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vera Dushevina vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 1-0
Vera Dushevina holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Dushevina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vera Dushevina won the 2003 Helsinki fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2003* | Helsinki | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Vera Dushevina | 6-2 6-3 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Dushevina | Denisa Chladkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |