H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vera Dushevina vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 1-1
Vera Dushevina and Virginia Ruano Pascual are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on clay, while Vera Dushevina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Dushevina won the 2008 Portoroz third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2008* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Vera Dushevina | 6-3 6-3 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| May 9, 2002* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Virginia Ruano Pascual | 6-1 7-6(2) | Vera Dushevina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Dushevina | Virginia Ruano Pascual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |