H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 3-1

Vera Zvonareva holds a 3–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 US Open round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
Russia Age 42 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vera Zvonareva #2 6-4 7-5 Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 Match data Sep 4, 2011* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Vera Zvonareva #8 Match data Oct 17, 2008* R16 Zurich Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Vera Zvonareva #9 6-0 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 Match data Sep 27, 2008* QF China Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Vera Zvonareva #11 6-2 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #48 Match data Sep 25, 2004* QF China Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vera Zvonareva #292 #2 7,935 2,089 466 270 63.3% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,834 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,848 0 1 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,926 0 2 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,681 0 3 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,886 0 5 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,938 0 5 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4
23 2008 63–23 73.3% #7 2,024 0 7 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,936 0 9 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,055 0 10 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,948 0 12 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2012 11–10 52.4% #95 1,847 0 12 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,567 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,772 0 12 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,618 0 11
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,688 0 12 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,541 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,689 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,707 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,682 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,733 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,764 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,719 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,687 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #292 1,648 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vera Zvonareva Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2000 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2003 19 14 33 57.6% 21 6 27 77.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2004 35 18 53 66.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2007 26 12 38 68.4% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2008 47 18 65 72.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2009 31 11 42 73.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2010 37 12 49 75.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 42 16 58 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2012 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2014 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2015 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 6 3 9 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320 185 505 63.4% 100 55 155 64.5% 38 23 61 62.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 483/704 of Vera Zvonareva's and 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vera Zvonareva Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 12/67 1.8 2.9 63.2% 66.5% 49.6% 59.9% 50.5% 59.9% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 13/81 3.2 5.2 55.1% 70.0% 43.0% 60.1% 47.6% 57.6% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 15/42 2.3 3.6 57.0% 70.3% 51.1% 58.3% 51.2% 61.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 38/59 2.6 2.7 59.3% 64.2% 45.7% 47.3% 49.2% 56.8% 45.0% 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3%
22 2007 37/44 1.9 4.1 58.8% 67.9% 48.4% 51.5% 52.8% 59.8% 46.7% 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6%
23 2008 67/86 2.2 3.9 60.8% 68.8% 48.8% 53.1% 56.3% 60.9% 48.7% 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6%
24 2009 43/48 2.1 4.0 62.9% 68.5% 46.8% 60.9% 52.8% 60.7% 47.6% 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3%
25 2010 62/67 2.2 3.1 65.1% 67.0% 48.5% 55.9% 50.3% 60.6% 47.7% 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3%
26 2011 67/76 3.0 4.1 60.6% 69.9% 45.2% 54.3% 50.4% 60.1% 46.9% 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0%
27 2012 17/21 1.8 4.5 63.3% 63.7% 45.6% 53.7% 57.2% 56.9% 43.2% 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6%
29 2014 8/8 2.8 4.3 63.3% 60.9% 41.6% 37.9% 26.3% 53.7% 39.9% 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8%
30 2015 15/15 2.2 4.7 62.9% 61.5% 44.9% 53.8% 49.2% 55.1% 44.1% 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3%
32 2017 4/4 0.5 2.5 67.7% 68.1% 52.8% 56.0% 49.5% 63.1% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 15/15 1.7 3.4 61.8% 58.9% 47.4% 51.4% 50.0% 54.3% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 13/13 1.6 4.3 65.3% 61.5% 43.8% 53.7% 46.1% 55.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 10/10 2.2 2.0 63.7% 64.2% 49.2% 59.5% 54.3% 58.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 21/22 1.8 3.4 67.1% 62.3% 41.4% 50.3% 50.8% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 11/11 1.4 3.5 66.6% 60.0% 48.4% 53.8% 45.5% 56.2% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 12/12 0.5 4.2 61.3% 59.4% 44.8% 56.4% 52.9% 54.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 3/3 0.7 2.3 68.7% 67.0% 35.3% 55.0% 28.2% 57.0% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 483/736 2.2 3.7 62.0% 66.4% 46.7% 54.1% 51.0% 58.9% 46.0% — 326/588 1.2 1.5 64.9% 61.1% 48.0% 50.5% 50.6% 56.5% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vera Zvonareva Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2000 1513 109.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1681 130.0 — — — — -116 +62 — 62.7% +0.87 3–6 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.60 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45
18 2003 1849 149.5 +2.41 +2.44 1.198 53.8% -99 +67 -140 64.4% +1.28 13–13 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.83 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66
19 2004 1926 159.6 +2.15 +4.28 1.171 53.5% -42 +34 -139 63.7% +0.91 12–12 (50%) 11–4 (73%) 104.9 -1.01 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26
20 2005 1682 124.3 +3.53 +1.85 1.223 53.6% +13 +211 +48 52.7% +0.41 4–7 (36%) 5–4 (56%) 93.2 +2.39 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71
21 2006 1887 151.9 +1.25 +1.19 1.042 50.9% -32 -64 -5 60.0% +0.96 8–5 (62%) 7–4 (64%) 104.1 -4.89 2004 1708 129.8 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46
22 2007 1938 159.4 +3.50 +2.92 1.164 53.1% -12 -46 — 64.9% +1.33 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 100.1 -1.53 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02
23 2008 2025 162.7 +5.37 +4.63 1.247 54.7% +3 -53 -198 69.5% +1.65 18–8 (69%) 10–12 (45%) 105.2 +0.64 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64
24 2009 1936 157.1 +4.96 +3.26 1.210 53.9% +35 — -104 70.2% +1.56 7–7 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 92.8 +0.96 2007 1682 135.1 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -106 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.01
25 2010 2056 160.9 +5.32 +4.46 1.210 53.7% +6 -183 -117 69.6% +1.38 8–4 (67%) 6–0 (100%) 106.1 -1.28 2008 1820 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -59 +96 -278 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 97.9 -0.46
26 2011 1948 159.2 +4.89 +4.16 1.175 53.2% +20 -77 -4 64.2% +1.06 19–7 (73%) 7–8 (47%) 103.4 +0.93 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +170 -48 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.67
27 2012 1848 114.1 +0.30 +0.09 1.003 50.1% +15 +5 +97 57.9% +0.24 4–0 (100%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.54 2010 1568 122.5 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -21 +188 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.63
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1783 138.0 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -112 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.92
29 2014 1773 110.5 -0.59 -1.20 0.861 46.7% +16 — +161 42.1% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.26 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -31 +157 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56
30 2015 1688 118.9 -1.94 +1.69 0.982 49.6% +7 — — 51.6% -0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.5 -0.48 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +153 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1491 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.24
32 2017 1689 114.6 +3.30 +0.35 1.220 53.3% +1 — — 85.7% +2.43 1–0 — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1708 125.4 -0.84 +1.40 0.988 49.5% +3 +98 — 36.7% -0.40 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1683 119.4 -0.92 -3.02 0.863 47.1% +48 +50 — 44.4% -0.37 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1734 131.1 +1.29 -1.13 0.967 49.4% +37 — — 43.5% -0.48 1–2 (33%) — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1765 134.8 -0.98 +0.91 0.984 49.7% -16 +67 +165 53.3% +0.22 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 97.6 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1720 126.8 -0.37 -0.35 0.927 48.4% -5 — — 36.0% -0.80 0–3 (0%) — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1688 120.5 -1.17 -1.18 0.877 47.7% -2 — — 31.8% -1.09 1–1 2–0 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1621 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1649 127.3 +0.98 -0.32 0.887 47.1% — — — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +3.01 +2.61 1.118 52.3% -8 +18 -32 61.5% +0.93 118–87 (58%) 76–72 (51%) 100.2 -0.48 — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -114 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.