H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 3-1

Vera Zvonareva holds a 3–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 US Open third round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 4, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #2 6-4 7-5 Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 Match data
Oct 17, 2008* Zurich WTA 500 R16 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Vera Zvonareva #8 Match data
Sep 27, 2008* Beijing WTA 500 QF Hard Vera Zvonareva #9 6-0 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 Match data
Sep 25, 2004* Beijing WTA 500 QF Hard Vera Zvonareva #11 6-2 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —