H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Vera Zvonareva vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 8-6
Vera Zvonareva holds a 8–6 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 6–5 on hard courts, while Vera Zvonareva leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 Doha semifinal 6-1 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
8
–
6
14 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2011* | Doha | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2010 | WTA Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-3 6-0 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Vera Zvonareva | 6-1 3-0 (ret.) | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2010* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-3 6-2 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2008 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2008* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 6-4 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2008* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 7-6(8) 7-6(5) | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2008* | Beijing | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2008* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Vera Zvonareva | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2008* | Miami | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-1 6-4 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2007* | Auckland | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 7-6(9) 5-7 6-3 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2006* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-1 6-1 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| May 12, 2005* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Vera Zvonareva | 6-4 6-1 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2004* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 6-4 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Zvonareva | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |