H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 22:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Jill Craybas H2H: 5-1

Vera Zvonareva holds a 5–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 5–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 San Diego third round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 2011* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #3 6-4 7-5 Jill Craybas #125 Match data
Jul 24, 2008* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #11 6-4 7-6(2) Jill Craybas #82 Match data
Mar 7, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Vera Zvonareva #20 7-5 6-1 Jill Craybas #63 Match data
Jan 6, 2007* Auckland WTA 250 SF Hard Vera Zvonareva #24 6-3 7-5 Jill Craybas #70 Match data
Aug 31, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Vera Zvonareva #34 6-3 7-5 Jill Craybas #52 Match data
Mar 27, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Jill Craybas #73 6-2 3-6 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —