H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 1-1

Vera Zvonareva and Kaia Kanepi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 1–0 on clay, while Vera Zvonareva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2018 Moscow River Cup third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 7, 2021 Dubai WTA 1000 Q2 Q Hard Kaia Kanepi #62 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #145 Match data
Jul 26, 2018* Moscow River Cup WTA 250 R32 Clay Kaia Kanepi #49 6-2 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #133 Match data
Sep 9, 2010* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Vera Zvonareva #8 6-3 7-5 Kaia Kanepi #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —